<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wrapped in gaffa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gaffa.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Programming, Art, Music, Philosophy, Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference? by Sexism in FOSS &#171; Wrapped in gaffa</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism in FOSS &#171; Wrapped in gaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>[...] second one has the headline &#8220;Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference?&#8220;, which is about a demonstration for women&#8217;s right to bathe topless. I actually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] second one has the headline &#8220;Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference?&#8220;, which is about a demonstration for women&#8217;s right to bathe topless. I actually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save Earth! Watch Porn! by Sexism in FOSS &#171; Wrapped in gaffa</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/save-earth-watch-porn/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism in FOSS &#171; Wrapped in gaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>[...] one is about a porn site called Fuck For Forest. Read it and judge for yourself. In my opinion there&#8217;s nothing sexist about that, but if you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one is about a porn site called Fuck For Forest. Read it and judge for yourself. In my opinion there&#8217;s nothing sexist about that, but if you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save Earth! Watch Porn! by odin</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/save-earth-watch-porn/#comment-4703</link>
		<dc:creator>odin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>FFF rocks.  If you&#039;re partial to lingerie, you can give http://hotchixdig.com a try - they&#039;re saving the world one pinup at a time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFF rocks.  If you&#8217;re partial to lingerie, you can give <a href="http://hotchixdig.com" rel="nofollow">http://hotchixdig.com</a> a try &#8211; they&#8217;re saving the world one pinup at a time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference? by cooker</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>cooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>Cooker says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooker says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Battle for Wesnoth by Eddie</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/battle-for-wesnoth/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/battle-for-wesnoth/#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>Hi, just popped in here through a random link. Hi, firstly I&#039;d like to say your site is great and very impressive. Enjoyed the reading. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just popped in here through a random link. Hi, firstly I&#8217;d like to say your site is great and very impressive. Enjoyed the reading. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference? by Carolynsolo</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolynsolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>The difference is that men find womens tits erotic. But women do not find mens tits erotic. 

Carolyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is that men find womens tits erotic. But women do not find mens tits erotic. </p>
<p>Carolyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Man tits women&#8217;s tits, what&#8217;s the difference? by johnnypeepers</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnypeepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/man-tits-womens-tits-whats-the-difference/#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>Wow, call out the perk-patrol, we have some unruly mams on the loose. Now lets see the difference between the junk in the knickers, I am doing a study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, call out the perk-patrol, we have some unruly mams on the loose. Now lets see the difference between the junk in the knickers, I am doing a study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Show me good use of ECMAScript on the Web by gaffa</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/show-me-good-use-of-ecmascript-on-the-web/#comment-3696</link>
		<dc:creator>gaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/show-me-good-use-of-ecmascript-on-the-web/#comment-3696</guid>
		<description>Hi, Hector.

I guess I was not being clear. I meant code executed in a users browser while viewing a website.

The only thing I can come up with that justifies executing code in my browser is Homebanking, but even then the best solution for both bank and user would be an independent application.

I&#039;m not trying to eliminate Java and Flash on the Web, I have nothing against sites that provide Flash and Java content, but that should be because it is really needed like fx. lunch break game sites. As it is now, sites are throwing ECMAScript, Java and Flash in my face if I&#039;m trying to find a recipe for meatloaf.

I would prefer if video and audio was presented as such instead of wrapping it up in an irrelevant plugin. As it is now content providers are forced to use the formats Adobe implements in Flash which is not much more than MP3 and FLV.

Video/audio should be played by a video/audio plugin. Leave Flash and Java to do what they were designed to do.

I&#039;m baking on a solution for content providers, which is an audio/video plugin for browsers Mac/Linux/Windows based on ffmpeg. Which could hopefully help digging us out of the mess using Flash as standard for video and audio on the web has put us in. I want to serve Vorbis audio, Theora video and playlists, without wrapping it up in an applet and still be sure everyone can view it.

The other part of the solution would be to disable execution of ECMAScript, Flash and Java at the user end to force sites that have no sane use of those to stop abusing my browser. I have my doubts any browser would permanently implement something like the NoScript extension for Firefox ;)

You can call me a Web racialist, but I&#039;m trying to bring some sanity back to the Web. Using the right tools for the right task is the key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Hector.</p>
<p>I guess I was not being clear. I meant code executed in a users browser while viewing a website.</p>
<p>The only thing I can come up with that justifies executing code in my browser is Homebanking, but even then the best solution for both bank and user would be an independent application.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to eliminate Java and Flash on the Web, I have nothing against sites that provide Flash and Java content, but that should be because it is really needed like fx. lunch break game sites. As it is now, sites are throwing ECMAScript, Java and Flash in my face if I&#8217;m trying to find a recipe for meatloaf.</p>
<p>I would prefer if video and audio was presented as such instead of wrapping it up in an irrelevant plugin. As it is now content providers are forced to use the formats Adobe implements in Flash which is not much more than MP3 and FLV.</p>
<p>Video/audio should be played by a video/audio plugin. Leave Flash and Java to do what they were designed to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m baking on a solution for content providers, which is an audio/video plugin for browsers Mac/Linux/Windows based on ffmpeg. Which could hopefully help digging us out of the mess using Flash as standard for video and audio on the web has put us in. I want to serve Vorbis audio, Theora video and playlists, without wrapping it up in an applet and still be sure everyone can view it.</p>
<p>The other part of the solution would be to disable execution of ECMAScript, Flash and Java at the user end to force sites that have no sane use of those to stop abusing my browser. I have my doubts any browser would permanently implement something like the NoScript extension for Firefox ;)</p>
<p>You can call me a Web racialist, but I&#8217;m trying to bring some sanity back to the Web. Using the right tools for the right task is the key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Show me good use of ECMAScript on the Web by Hector</title>
		<link>http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/show-me-good-use-of-ecmascript-on-the-web/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaffa.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/show-me-good-use-of-ecmascript-on-the-web/#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>You need to distinguish between client and server end.  Server end ECMAScript operates very well in business applications including barcoded entry, complex decision analysis routines for farm planning, feed mixing in food industry, product blending, transport routing as well as tactical decisions in litigation and a range of expert dialogue systems.  We never use Java but Flash ActionScrip is largely ECMAScript and are an increasing range of server-end apps. One of the most interesting and powerful server end kits which allows you to lever the true flexibility of ECMAScript as embedded code is the Vanguard System, formerly known as DecisionScript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to distinguish between client and server end.  Server end ECMAScript operates very well in business applications including barcoded entry, complex decision analysis routines for farm planning, feed mixing in food industry, product blending, transport routing as well as tactical decisions in litigation and a range of expert dialogue systems.  We never use Java but Flash ActionScrip is largely ECMAScript and are an increasing range of server-end apps. One of the most interesting and powerful server end kits which allows you to lever the true flexibility of ECMAScript as embedded code is the Vanguard System, formerly known as DecisionScript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
